Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand weeding suppressed weed growth more effectively than 2,4-D.

A claim from Response of Sorghum Genotypes to Weed Management under Mediterranean Conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding suppressed weed growth more effectively than 2,4-D.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
2,4-De0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19
e0

“Hand weeding was more effective than 2,4-D in suppressing weed growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–738

Title

Response of Sorghum Genotypes to Weed Management under Mediterranean Conditions

Munir A. Turk; Abdel-Rahman .; M. Tawaha . Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.3923/ja.2002.31.33

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-dc7f1dbdcc67bb10cf63ee5892cd61fb279a98224f9da9dad92e7d32ba91349d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · SorghumPositive and negative results

35 papers: 34 positive, 1 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.