Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping reduced mean tuber weight and tuber yield of cassava.

A claim from Mixture productivity of cassava‐based cropping system and food security under humid tropical conditions · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced mean tuber weight and tuber yield of cassava.

Treatment
intercroppinge2
Outcome
mean tuber weight and tuber yielde2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
monocropse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropped with cassava (var. TMS 30572 and TME 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–160
e2

“Similarly, intercropping highly significantly ( P < 0.01) reduced number of leaves and plant height at 2, 3, 4 and 12 months after planting (MAP), number and weight of tubers per plant, mean tuber weight and tuber yield of cassava relative to their monocrops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1130

Title

Mixture productivity of cassava‐based cropping system and food security under humid tropical conditions

Yewande A. Adekunle; Victor I. Olowe; Faucett O. Olasantan; et al. Food and Energy Security 2014. doi:10.1002/fes3.46

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-dca4c74b95b40649e00aa9bfd2e313540c59303c51d495ba7cb07d65cb2ea9b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.