Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstocks enhanced nutrient uptake, plant growth and total fruit yield of watermelon.

A claim from Effects of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) rootstocks on plant nutrient content of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mats. & Nak.] leaf and nitrogen use efficiency · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle gourd rootstocks enhanced nutrient uptake, plant growth and total fruit yield of watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Bottle gourd rootstockse6
Outcome
nutrient uptake, plant growth and total fruit yielde6
Direction
enhancede6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) rootstocks on plant nutrient content of watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96
e6

“Bottle gourd rootstocks used in this study enhanced the nutrient uptake, plant growth and total fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1589

Title

Effects of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) rootstocks on plant nutrient content of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mats. & Nak.] leaf and nitrogen use efficiency

Halit YETİŞİR; Nebahat SARI Derim 2019. doi:10.16882/derim.2019.443162

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-dced692a0c7e7966c38996c1f2f15e68849d27290b74828d457741ce91cac030 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Lagenaria siceraria · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.