Intervention effectmodel-written summary

flood irrigation system produced 80.66 cm for plant height.

A claim from Utilization of Smart Irrigation for Different Irrigation Systems on the Growth and Production of Different Rice Cultivars · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

flood irrigation system produced 80.66 cm for plant height.

Treatment
flood irrigation systeme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
80.66 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flood irrigation system obtained the highest plant height stood 80.66 cm and the highest yield reached stood 3.424 tons ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1298
t0

“Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–121

Title

Utilization of Smart Irrigation for Different Irrigation Systems on the Growth and Production of Different Rice Cultivars

Hussam H. Nayef; Abdul Razzak A. Jasim NeuroQuantology 2022. doi:10.14704/nq.2022.20.4.nq22092

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-dd1df11fbb58c1fce9b9691a8fe1cd822ccce695f55b7162523826260aeb7640 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

flooding · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 64 positive, 74 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this claim · 72 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Anoxia caused root extension growth to decline and halt.

    The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots · 1983

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Later coleoptile elongation stayed at control rates even in anoxia.

    The Effect of Oxygen and Turbulence on Elongation of Coleoptiles of Submergence-Tolerant and -Intolerant Rice Cultivars · 1982 · compared with control rates

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Submergence nearly stopped rice dry matter accumulation.

    Injury to Rice Plants Caused by Complete Submergence; A Contribution by Ethylerie (Ethene) · 1987

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Submergence stress severely hampered rice germination and seedling growth.

    Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Primed and Non-primed Rice Seedlings under Submergence Stress · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Soil submergence reduced dry-seeded rice emergence and growth.

    Soil Water and Growth of Rice and Weeds · 1973

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Solution from flooded soil with wheat straw markedly inhibited rice root elongation.

    Identification and evaluation of toxicity of rice root elongation inhibitors in flooded soils with added wheat straw · 1990

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Susceptible varieties showed greater leaf area reduction under flooding.

    Physiological Basis of Stagnant Flooding Tolerance in Rice · 2017 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Flooding reduced seedling emergence in all rice genotypes.

    Responses of AG1 and AG2 QTL introgression lines and seed pre-treatment on growth and physiological processes during anaerobic germination of rice under flooding · 2020

    Opposite direction

129 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Sprinkler irrigation reduced plant height by 0.09 to 0.28 m compared with flooding.

    Sprinkler vs. Flood Irrigation in Traditional Rice Production Regions of Southeast Texas · 1990 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Cold irrigation significantly reduced rice shoot and root dry weight and height.

    Effect of Low Temperature of Irrigation Water on Rice Growth and Nutrient Uptake · 1994 · compared with hot temperature treatment

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Soil mechanical impedance as low as 0.01 MPa inhibited rice root growth in a lowland field gradient treatment.

    Root Response to Water Stress in Rainfed Lowland Rice · 1990

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Growth performance and physiological activities of rice differed only marginally for a 5-day irrigation difference.

    Impact of cyclic water stress on growth, physiological responses and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in tropical environment · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    AWD decreased rice height by 9% relative to control.

    Effect of various water regimes on rice production in lowland irrigation · 2015 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    AWDI had no significant effect on rice biomass and grain.

    Nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy: Impacts of rice straw and water management · 2023

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Ending irrigation early in cv. Gleva later caused a substantial decline in the ability of seeds to germinate normally.

    Seed quality in rice is most sensitive to drought and high temperature in early seed development · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Treated sewage irrigation did not adversely affect rice growth.

    Effects of treated sewage irrigation on paddy rice culture and its soil · 2001

    Opposite direction

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.