Paper · 1983 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots

T. WEBB; W. ARMSTRONG

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
133
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Intact or excised roots, immersed in anaerobic aqueous agar media with or without additions of sugar, were made anoxic by exposing the shoots (or cut-ends) to oxygen-free nitrogen. Polarographic monitoring of the internal oxygen status showed that roots rapidly became anoxic; also extension growth immediately declined and was soon halted. Growth was re-started only by re-aeration and, in sugar deficient media, apices survived only if the period of anoxia had not exceeded 4 h (rice), 6 h (pea) and 12 h (pumpkin). Utilizable carbohydrate supplied exogenously could reduce the rate of decline in growth rate (rice and pumpkin) but could not of itself indefinitely sustain or induce growth; it enhanced viability, however, and rice became the most tolerant of anoxia (c. 44 h). Oxygen was essential both to sustain and initiate root extension but growth could cease and apical death ensue from an insufficiency of carbohydrate even in the presence of oxygen. It is concluded that the normal response of roots to anoxia is a hypersensitive one arising from sugar deficiency. The discussion relates the results to recent reports concerning carbohydrate and energy levels in anoxic and aerated roots, to work on ultrastructural change under anoxia, and to the subject of flood tolerance. The results are not thought to accord with a metabolic theory of flood-tolerance based upon differences in the accumulation and phytotoxicities of ethanol and other by-products of anaerobic respiration. They are considered to be more in keeping with the view that flood-tolerance in roots is chiefly a property of internal aeration and the potential for producing well-ventilated roots in response to soil wetness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anoxia caused root extension growth to decline and halt.

Taxon
Rice, Pea and Pumpkint0
Treatment
Anoxiat0
Outcome
extension growthe1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Polarographic monitoring of the internal oxygen status showed that roots rapidly became anoxic; also extension growth immediately declined and was soon halted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–339 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice apices survived anoxia only up to 4 h in sugar-deficient media.

Outcome
apices survivede2
Value
4 he2
Qualifier
in sugar deficient mediae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in sugar deficient media, apices survived only if the period of anoxia had not exceeded 4 h (rice), 6 h (pea) and 12 h (pumpkin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–516 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea apices survived anoxia only up to 6 h in sugar-deficient media.

Outcome
apices survivede2
Value
6 he2
Qualifier
in sugar deficient mediae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in sugar deficient media, apices survived only if the period of anoxia had not exceeded 4 h (rice), 6 h (pea) and 12 h (pumpkin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–516 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin apices survived anoxia only up to 12 h in sugar-deficient media.

Taxon
pumpkine2
Outcome
apices survivede2
Value
12 he2
Qualifier
in sugar deficient mediae2

Verbatim

e2

“in sugar deficient media, apices survived only if the period of anoxia had not exceeded 4 h (rice), 6 h (pea) and 12 h (pumpkin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous utilizable carbohydrate reduced the rate of decline in growth rate under anoxia in rice and pumpkin.

Taxon
rice and pumpkine3
Treatment
Utilizable carbohydrate supplied exogenouslye3
Outcome
rate of decline in growth ratee3
Direction
reducee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Utilizable carbohydrate supplied exogenously could reduce the rate of decline in growth rate (rice and pumpkin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous carbohydrate enhanced root viability under anoxia.

Taxon
Rice, Pea and Pumpkint0
Treatment
Utilizable carbohydratee3
Outcome
viabilitye4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Utilizable carbohydrate supplied exogenously could reduce the rate of decline in growth rate (rice and pumpkin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–629 · show in text ↑
e4

“it enhanced viability, however, and rice became the most tolerant of anoxia (c. 44 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–778 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice was the most tolerant of anoxia, about 44 h.

Outcome
most tolerant of anoxiae4
Value
c. 44 he4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“it enhanced viability, however, and rice became the most tolerant of anoxia (c. 44 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–778 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen was essential to sustain and initiate root extension.

Taxon
Rice, Pea and Pumpkint0
Treatment
Oxygene5
Outcome
root extensione5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“Oxygen was essential both to sustain and initiate root extension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–844 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apical death of roots followed carbohydrate insufficiency even in the presence of oxygen.

Taxon
Rice, Pea and Pumpkint0
Treatment
insufficiency of carbohydratee6
Outcome
apical deathe6
Qualifier
even in the presence of oxygene6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e6

“growth could cease and apical death ensue from an insufficiency of carbohydrate even in the presence of oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–959 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The normal root response to anoxia is a hypersensitive response arising from sugar deficiency.

Taxon
Rice, Pea and Pumpkint0
Treatment
sugar deficiencye7
Outcome
response of roots to anoxiae7

Verbatim

t0

“The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“It is concluded that the normal response of roots to anoxia is a hypersensitive one arising from sugar deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1074 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Flood tolerance in roots is chiefly a property of internal aeration.

Taxon
Rice, Pea and Pumpkint0
Outcome
flood-tolerance in rootse1
Qualifier
chiefly a property of internal aeratione1

Verbatim

t0

“The Effects of Anoxia and Carbohydrates on the Growth and Viability of Rice, Pea and Pumpkin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“flood-tolerance in roots is chiefly a property of internal aeration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1618 · show in text ↑

carbohydrate · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

flooding · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 64 positive, 74 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

flooding · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flooding · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.