Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Root-zone fertilization tended to increase assimilatory nitrate reduction.

A claim from Root-Zone Nitrogen Fertilization Increases Oilseed Rape Yield: Reprogramming Rhizosphere N-Cycling and Strengthening Soil–Plant Coupling · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone fertilization tended to increase assimilatory nitrate reduction.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Root-zone nitrogen fertilizatione2
Outcome
assimilatory nitrate reductione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
a tendency towarde0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a tendency toward increased assimilatory nitrate reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–837
e1

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–238
e2

“Root-zone nitrogen fertilization (RZF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38
e3

“conventional fertilization (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–293

Title

Root-Zone Nitrogen Fertilization Increases Oilseed Rape Yield: Reprogramming Rhizosphere N-Cycling and Strengthening Soil–Plant Coupling

Liang Cheng; Quanjie Shen; Yifan Wang Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15081137

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-dd5f5145ffc7d5bbc9a8d1e4a48a837c3a94e618b3aa81eb527145d6532dc033 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.