Paper · 1991 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

The effect of time of S application on yield and sulphur uptake of canola

W.F. Nuttall; H. Ukrainetz

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Little information was available on the yield response of canola species to application of sulphur (S) fertilizer at various times after seeding. Split plot experiments having two cultivars, ‘Candle’ (Brassica campestris L.) and ‘Regent’ (Brassica napus L.) as main plots and four times of applying S fertilizer as subplots after seeding (0, 14, 28 and 42 days) were set out on six sulphur deficient soil sites of northern Saskatchewan. Sodium sulphate fertilizer was applied at 25 kg S/ha and all plots received 100, 20 and 50 kg/ha of N, P and K, respectively. The cultivar ‘Regent’ yielded 1.24 t/ha which was significantly higher than ‘Candle’ yielding 0.98 t/ha (average over sites). An estimated linear reduction in yield of canola grain of 0.11 t/ha for ‘Candle’ and 0.40 t/ha for ‘Regent’ was obtained with S applied at 42 days after seeding date. This difference in response to time of S application resulted in a cultivar x time of S interaction. On two other sites testing high in S (above 40 kg S/ha) there was an apparent increase in grain yield with S application at the rosette stage and at the second application time (12 days before reseeding because of frost damage). Sulphur uptake in grain and straw was highly correlated with yield of grain and straw. Average uptake of S in straw (15.1 kg S/ha) was higher than in grain (4.4 kg S/ha). With few exceptions, yield and S uptake in grain and straw was less with S fertilizer applied at late stages of growth than at seeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regent yielded 1.24 t/ha, significantly above Candle at 0.98 t/ha.

Material
‘Regent’e0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.24 t/hae0
Qualifier
0.98 t/hae0
Comparator
‘Candle’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar ‘Regent’ yielded 1.24 t/ha which was significantly higher than ‘Candle’ yielding 0.98 t/ha (average over sites)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application 42 days after seeding was associated with a 0.11 t/ha linear grain yield reduction for Candle.

Material
‘Candle’e0
Treatment
S applied at 42 days after seeding datee0
Outcome
yield of canola graine0
Direction
reductione0
Value
0.11 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An estimated linear reduction in yield of canola grain of 0.11 t/ha for ‘Candle’ and 0.40 t/ha for ‘Regent’ was obtained with S applied at 42 days after seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application 42 days after seeding was associated with a 0.40 t/ha linear grain yield reduction for Regent.

Material
‘Regent’e0
Treatment
S applied at 42 days after seeding datee0
Outcome
yield of canola graine0
Direction
reductione0
Value
0.40 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An estimated linear reduction in yield of canola grain of 0.11 t/ha for ‘Candle’ and 0.40 t/ha for ‘Regent’ was obtained with S applied at 42 days after seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–863 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in yield response to timing of sulfur application.

Treatment
time of S applicatione0
Outcome
cultivar x time of S interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This difference in response to time of S application resulted in a cultivar x time of S interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two high sulfur sites, sulfur application at rosette stage apparently increased grain yield.

Treatment
S application at the rosette stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
two other sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On two other sites testing high in S (above 40 kg S/ha) there was an apparent increase in grain yield with S application at the rosette stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two high sulfur sites, sulfur application at the second time apparently increased grain yield.

Treatment
second application timee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
12 days before reseeding because of frost damagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was an apparent increase in grain yield with S application at the rosette stage and at the second application time (12 days before reseeding because of frost damage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur uptake in grain and straw was highly correlated with their yields.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe0
Outcome
yield of grain and strawe0
Qualifier
Sulphur uptake in grain and strawe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur uptake in grain and straw was highly correlated with yield of grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average sulfur uptake was higher in straw than grain.

Outcome
uptake of S in strawe0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.1 kg S/hae0
Qualifier
4.4 kg S/hae0
Comparator
graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average uptake of S in straw (15.1 kg S/ha) was higher than in grain (4.4 kg S/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sulfur fertilization generally reduced grain yield relative to fertilization at seeding.

Treatment
S fertilizer applied at late stages of growthe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
at seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With few exceptions, yield and S uptake in grain and straw was less with S fertilizer applied at late stages of growth than at seeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sulfur fertilization generally reduced sulfur uptake in grain and straw relative to fertilization at seeding.

Treatment
S fertilizer applied at late stages of growthe0
Outcome
S uptake in grain and strawe0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
at seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With few exceptions, yield and S uptake in grain and straw was less with S fertilizer applied at late stages of growth than at seeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sowing time · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 39 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 337 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.