Claim · model-written summary
Soil P accumulation was higher in peanut–CTW at 6.4 kg ha −1.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Outcome
- P in peanut–CTWe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6.4 kg ha −1e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Found higher accumulation of soil N in peanut–ZTW–sesbania (33.8 kg ha −1 ), P in peanut–CTW (6.4 kg ha −1 ), and S in peanut–CTW (3.7 kg ha −1 ) crop rotations.”
Title
N.K. Jain; R.S. Jat; H.N. Meena; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.08.0467
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Peanut pod yield was higher after wheat under either tillage and green manuring.
- Intervention effect Green manuring in peanut–ZTW gave higher wheat grain yield of 3.11 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect Green manuring in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea grain yield of 1.76 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect Sesbania green manure increased root biomass of peanut, wheat and pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Peanut–ZTW or CTW with sesbania or green gram green manure had significantly higher peanut pod equivalent yield of 3.64 t ha −1.
- Observation Soil N accumulation was higher in peanut–ZTW–sesbania at 33.8 kg ha −1.
- Observation Soil S accumulation was higher in peanut–CTW at 3.7 kg ha −1.
- Intervention effect Green manuring or wheat straw incorporation increased soil enzyme activities over sole peanut.
- Observation Soil bulk density was lower in peanut–CTW.
- Observation Soil bulk density was higher in peanut–ZTW.
- Recommendation Peanut after wheat with tillage and sesbania or green gram green manure was considered more sustainable than sole peanut.