Claim · model-written summary
Peanut after wheat with tillage and sesbania or green gram green manure was considered more sustainable than sole peanut.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- green manuring either with sesbania or green grame0
- Outcome
- more sustainablee0
- Comparator
- sole peanute0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peanut followed by ZTW or CTW and green manuring either with sesbania or green gram found more sustainable than sole peanut in terms of peanut‐pod equivalent yield and improved soil enzyme activities.”
Title
N.K. Jain; R.S. Jat; H.N. Meena; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.08.0467
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Peanut pod yield was higher after wheat under either tillage and green manuring.
- Intervention effect Green manuring in peanut–ZTW gave higher wheat grain yield of 3.11 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect Green manuring in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea grain yield of 1.76 t ha −1.
- Intervention effect Sesbania green manure increased root biomass of peanut, wheat and pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Peanut–ZTW or CTW with sesbania or green gram green manure had significantly higher peanut pod equivalent yield of 3.64 t ha −1.
- Observation Soil N accumulation was higher in peanut–ZTW–sesbania at 33.8 kg ha −1.
- Observation Soil P accumulation was higher in peanut–CTW at 6.4 kg ha −1.
- Observation Soil S accumulation was higher in peanut–CTW at 3.7 kg ha −1.
- Intervention effect Green manuring or wheat straw incorporation increased soil enzyme activities over sole peanut.
- Observation Soil bulk density was lower in peanut–CTW.
- Observation Soil bulk density was higher in peanut–ZTW.