Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rainfall timing did not change yield with NBPT-treated urea, which ranged from 7904 to 8264 kg ha−1.

A claim from Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake as Affected by Urea Amendment and Rainfall Timing · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall timing did not change yield with NBPT-treated urea, which ranged from 7904 to 8264 kg ha−1.

Treatment
simulated rainfall timinge0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Value
7904–8264 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
NBPT‐treated ureae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was unaffected by simulated rainfall timing when rice was fertilized with NBPT‐treated urea (7904–8264 kg ha −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1151

Title

Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake as Affected by Urea Amendment and Rainfall Timing

Randy J. Dempsey; Nathan A. Slaton; Trenton L. Roberts; et al. Agronomy Journal 2017. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.04.0216

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-de2dbfbea4bdc70660d660480ea6b99c87fd315e751a0605287c9fbbf0d94aec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 29 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.