Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall timing did not change yield with NBPT-treated urea, which ranged from 7904 to 8264 kg ha−1.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Treatment
- simulated rainfall timinge0
- Outcome
- Yielde0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
- Value
- 7904–8264 kg ha −1e0
- Qualifier
- NBPT‐treated ureae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield was unaffected by simulated rainfall timing when rice was fertilized with NBPT‐treated urea (7904–8264 kg ha −1 ).”
Title
Rice Grain Yield and Nitrogen Uptake as Affected by Urea Amendment and Rainfall Timing
Randy J. Dempsey; Nathan A. Slaton; Trenton L. Roberts; et al. Agronomy Journal 2017. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.04.0216
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Without NBPT, no simulated rainfall gave greater rice yield than rainfall after or before nitrogen application.
- Intervention effect NBPT-treated urea raised rice yield by 6.9 to 21.3% within each rainfall timing.
- Intervention effect Nitrapyrin rate had no yield effect in 2013.
- Intervention effect NP-treated urea reduced rice yield by 5.6% against untreated urea in 2014.
- Intervention effect Applying urea to moist soil followed by drying or dry soil followed by rain yielded less rice than dry soil remaining dry until flooding.