Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At Kalyani, the green-manure and NPK regime stabilized rice and wheat yields.

A claim from STABILITY ANALYSIS OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA): WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) CROPPING SYSTEM IN INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Kalyani, the green-manure and NPK regime stabilized rice and wheat yields.

Treatment
75% recommended NPK + 25% by green-manuring in rainy (kharif) season followed by 75% recommended NPK in winter (rabi) seasone0
Outcome
yields of rice and wheate0
Direction
stabilizee0
Setting
Kalyanie0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Kalyani, 75% recommended NPK + 25% by green-manuring in rainy (kharif) season followed by 75% recommended NPK in winter (rabi) season could stabilize yields of rice and wheat and save 25% N fertilizer in winter season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–916

Title

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF RICE (ORYZA SATIVA): WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) CROPPING SYSTEM IN INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

V. Katyal; Sheetal Sharma; K. S. Gangwar The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1998

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-bafda76d4c2ff75ccc7d327e6bf060420b0cc6145455d2327a387d2e1080b073 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

rainfall · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 32 positive, 49 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 29 positive, 22 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this claim · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.