Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mean sorghum yield under agroforestry was 1.92 t/ha versus 1.02 t/ha on land without agroforestry.

A claim from Fostering resilience: women and youth leading agroforestry for enhanced food security and poverty alleviation in Dodoma District, Tanzania · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean sorghum yield under agroforestry was 1.92 t/ha versus 1.02 t/ha on land without agroforestry.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
agroforestrye0
Outcome
mean crop yieldse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.92e0
Qualifier
1.02e1
Comparator
land without agroforestrye1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean crop yields in tons per hectare for agroforestry included: maize (1.98), sunflower (1.43), millet (2.34), sorghum (1.92)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–790
e1

“For land without agroforestry, the yields were 1.08, 1.50, 1.72, 1.02, and 36.8 tons per hectare, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–922

Title

Fostering resilience: women and youth leading agroforestry for enhanced food security and poverty alleviation in Dodoma District, Tanzania

Leopody Gayo; Kelvin Ngongolo African Geographical Review 2024. doi:10.1080/19376812.2024.2399570

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-de50c021fa0ca0ab6787efc4e78700f96374b8ac18c26d887b49ba44d1dbb127 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.