Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Coinoculation with m6418 reduced broccoli head rot disease by 41%.

A claim from Evaluation of Bacterial Antagonists for Biological Control of Broccoli Head Rot Caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation with m6418 reduced broccoli head rot disease by 41%.

Organ / stage
broccoli heade0
Treatment
strain m6418, when coinoculated with P. fluorescens 5064e0
Interactor
P. fluorescens 5064Pseudomonas fluorescense0pathogen
Second interactor
strain m6418e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In an excised broccoli head pathogenicity test, strain m6418, when coinoculated with P. fluorescens 5064, reduced disease by 41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–884

Title

Evaluation of Bacterial Antagonists for Biological Control of Broccoli Head Rot Caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens

Xiaohui Cui; Rob Harling Phytopathology 2006. doi:10.1094/phyto-96-0408

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-de57d86bf7eb01499fb0de63dce64fa07b856c16e9d5b49ee273eb2ab914c24f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.