Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Liquid and tablet inoculation methods showed no clear difference in cucumber fruit and petiole nitrate.

A claim from IMPACT OF MINERAL AND BIO-NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON NITRATE ACCUMULATION OF CUCUMBER · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid and tablet inoculation methods showed no clear difference in cucumber fruit and petiole nitrate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
inoculation method-se0
Outcome
nitrate content of cucumber fruits and petiolese0
Direction
No clear differencese0
Comparator
the lnoculum was added as tabletse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No clear differences in nitrate content of cucumber fruits and petioles were observed due to inoculation method-s in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1537
e1

“The main plots were assigned to two inoculation methods of ‘l- the inoculum was added as liquid and, 2- the lnoculum was added as tablets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–587

Title

IMPACT OF MINERAL AND BIO-NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON NITRATE ACCUMULATION OF CUCUMBER

R.E. Knany; Manal Abd Alla Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2006. doi:10.21608/jssae.2006.202917

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-de5e2a75ee40514a8ce2719a2e71adb966a0cf804061ea5155250678193863d6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.