Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Red-blue-green LED light significantly increased the levels of amino acids in Chinese cabbage relative to white light.

A claim from Effects of Different LED Spectra on the Antioxidant Capacity and Nitrogen Metabolism of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. Pekinensis) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-blue-green LED light significantly increased the levels of amino acids in Chinese cabbage relative to white light.

Treatment
RBG combined light treatmente2
Outcome
levels of amino acidse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
white lighte4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Meanwhile, RBG combined light treatment significantly increased the levels of amino acids but decreased the nitrite content of Chinese cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–814
e4

“while white light served as the control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–470

Title

Effects of Different LED Spectra on the Antioxidant Capacity and Nitrogen Metabolism of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. Pekinensis)

Jie Li; Yubing Liu; Junwei Wang; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13212958

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ded7c39e964b167fcb5534556243a544798301db8b3ccdb48a34deabfb85f1be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

light · molecular: metabolites · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.