Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn foliar treatment changed onion dry yield by 23.6% relative to control in the first growing season.

A claim from RESPONSE OF ONION TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF SOME MICRONUTRIENTS · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn foliar treatment changed onion dry yield by 23.6% relative to control in the first growing season.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepae1
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
onion yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
23.6%e0
Qualifier
first growing seasone0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increment percentages were 9.7%, 2.2%, 23.6%, and 11.5% for the first growing season and 0.0%, 5.6%, 27.8%, and 18.5% for the second growing season over the control for Fe, Mn, Zn, and B treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–652
e1

“onion yield (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286

Title

RESPONSE OF ONION TO FOLIAR APPLICATION OF SOME MICRONUTRIENTS

Zaghalol T. Sliman; Mohamed A. Abdelhakim; Aly A. Omran Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 1999. doi:10.21608/ejar.1999.336498

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-df8483b7d90fdb9f8b408ac7c996cecf59afcddd620819539785b685dbea3bbe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.