Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IAA promoted lateral root emergence from cultured P. vulgaris roots excised at 1 cm, whereas comparable roots without IAA never formed lateral roots.

A claim from Chemical Factors Affecting Growth and Development of Lateral Root Formation in Isolated Phaseolus vulgaris L. · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA promoted lateral root emergence from cultured P. vulgaris roots excised at 1 cm, whereas comparable roots without IAA never formed lateral roots.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
cultured rootse0
Treatment
IAA treatmentse0
Outcome
lateral root emergencee0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
1-cm long at the time of excisione0
Comparator
absence of IAAe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA treatments promoted lateral root emergence from cultured roots of P. vulgaris, which were 1-cm long at the time of excision ; such roots never formed in similar primaries grown in the absence of IAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–553

Title

Chemical Factors Affecting Growth and Development of Lateral Root Formation in Isolated Phaseolus vulgaris L.

S. M. ZEADAN Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) 2007

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-df91bb34bee82f19551f382bed662a464cf88feaffa0d209870402c95b729f0f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

32 papers: 18 positive, 14 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.