Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Black oat straw intercropped with white lupine reduced weed infestation and absolute weed density.

A claim from Population density and weed infestation in organic no-tillage corn cropping system under different soil covers · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black oat straw intercropped with white lupine reduced weed infestation and absolute weed density.

Treatment
black oat straw alone or intercropped with white lupinee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
percentage of weed infestation and absolute weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of black oat straw alone or intercropped with white lupine, in the organic no-tillage corn cropping system, reduced the percentage of weed infestation and absolute weed density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1162

Title

Population density and weed infestation in organic no-tillage corn cropping system under different soil covers

L.F. Favarato; J.C.C. Galvão; J.L. Souza; et al. Planta Daninha 2014. doi:10.1590/s0100-83582014000400008

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-dfc85cd0fe735e9b01316fcca2134dfa4356e78e184bdef69453d2372c7096a6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

intercropping · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.