Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 1:1 CTS/CUR composite coating significantly outperformed the individual coatings and uncoated samples in maintaining postharvest cherry tomato quality.

A claim from Characterizations of Water-Soluble Chitosan/Curdlan Edible Coatings and the Inhibitory Effect on Postharvest Pathogenic Fungi · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 CTS/CUR composite coating significantly outperformed the individual coatings and uncoated samples in maintaining postharvest cherry tomato quality.

Treatment
CTS/CUR composite coating at a 1:1 ratioe3
Outcome
quality of postharvest cherry tomatoese3
Direction
significantly outperformede3
Comparator
individual CTS or CUR coating and uncoated samplese3
Setting
at 25 ± 1 °C with a relative humidity of approximately 92% over 10 dayse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes served as the test material for assessing the preservative efficacy of these coatings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–213
e3

“the CTS/CUR composite coating at a 1:1 ratio significantly outperformed the individual CTS or CUR coating and uncoated samples in maintaining the quality of postharvest cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–826
e4

“conducted at 25 ± 1 °C with a relative humidity of approximately 92% over 10 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–626

Title

Characterizations of Water-Soluble Chitosan/Curdlan Edible Coatings and the Inhibitory Effect on Postharvest Pathogenic Fungi

Youwei Yu; Kunyu Liu; Shaoying Zhang; et al. Foods 2024. doi:10.3390/foods13030441

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-dfd71e497e6ea28261499a0e683dc94934efe3425713cf0e0d0a6ec339bb8206 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

chitosan · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 38 positive, 6 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.