Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All herbicides except Roundup PowerMax alone controlled Russian thistle and crabgrass by more than 89%.

A claim from Weed Control with Postemergence Applications of Status, Armezon, Atrazine, Corvus, Verdict, and Roundup PowerMax in Irrigated Corn · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides except Roundup PowerMax alone controlled Russian thistle and crabgrass by more than 89%.

Treatment
All postemergence herbicides except Roundup PowerMax (glypho­sate) alonee0
Interactor
Russian thistleSalsola traguse0weed
Second interactor
crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
controlled Russian thistle and crabgrasse0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salsola tragus
Salsola tragus · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All postemergence herbicides except Roundup PowerMax (glypho­sate) alone controlled Russian thistle and crabgrass greater than 89%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–320
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–130

Title

Weed Control with Postemergence Applications of Status, Armezon, Atrazine, Corvus, Verdict, and Roundup PowerMax in Irrigated Corn

R. Currie; P. Geier Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 2016. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.1266

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-dff4ec9bedd188b6bcd212a9d3f7ace93d1da39e29803376475c879d23f3c581 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Salsola tragus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.