Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare season-long weed control from single and sequential herbicide applications in corn. Control of all weed species was generally good (90% or more) early in the season regardless of preemergence (PRE) herbicide. However, Russian thistle and Palmer amaranth control was best later in the season when a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatment. While all herbicide treatments increased yields compared to the untreated control, yields were greatest when Lumax EZ PRE (atrazine/mesotrione/metolachlor) was followed by Acuron (atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/metolachlor) and glyphosate POST.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
All preemergence herbicides gave at least 90% control of all weed species early in the season.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- preemergence (PRE) herbicidee0
- Outcome
- Control of all weed speciese0
- Value
- 90% or moree0
- Qualifier
- early in the seasone0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Control of all weed species was generally good (90% or more) early in the season regardless of preemergence (PRE) herbicide.”
t0“in Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Later season Russian thistle control was best with a preemergence herbicide followed by postemergence treatment.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatmente0
- Interactor
- Russian thistle
Salsola traguse0weed - Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- later in the seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Russian thistle and Palmer amaranth control was best later in the season when a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatment.”
t0“in Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Later season Palmer amaranth control was best with a preemergence herbicide followed by postemergence treatment.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatmente0
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe0weed
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranth controle0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- later in the seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Russian thistle and Palmer amaranth control was best later in the season when a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatment.”
t0“in Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
All herbicide treatments increased corn yield compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- all herbicide treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all herbicide treatments increased yields compared to the untreated control”
t0“in Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn yields were greatest with Lumax EZ preemergence followed by Acuron and glyphosate postemergence.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Lumax EZ PRE (atrazine/mesotrione/metolachlor) was followed by Acuron (atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/metolachlor) and glyphosate POSTe0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yields were greatest when Lumax EZ PRE (atrazine/mesotrione/metolachlor) was followed by Acuron (atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/metolachlor) and glyphosate POST.”
t0“in Corn”
The same questions in other papers
metolachlor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →mesotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
115 papers more in this group
See all 119 papers →herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
402 papers more in this group
See all 406 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →herbicide · Salsola tragus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.