Paper · 2022 · Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Single and Split Herbicide Applications for Efficacy in Corn

R. S. Currie; P. W. Geier

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare season-long weed control from single and sequential herbicide applications in corn. Control of all weed species was generally good (90% or more) early in the season regardless of preemergence (PRE) herbicide. However, Russian thistle and Palmer amaranth control was best later in the season when a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatment. While all herbicide treatments increased yields compared to the untreated control, yields were greatest when Lumax EZ PRE (atrazine/mesotrione/metolachlor) was followed by Acuron (atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/metolachlor) and glyphosate POST.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All preemergence herbicides gave at least 90% control of all weed species early in the season.

Treatment
preemergence (PRE) herbicidee0
Outcome
Control of all weed speciese0
Value
90% or moree0
Qualifier
early in the seasone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of all weed species was generally good (90% or more) early in the season regardless of preemergence (PRE) herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later season Russian thistle control was best with a preemergence herbicide followed by postemergence treatment.

Treatment
a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatmente0
Interactor
Russian thistleSalsola traguse0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
later in the seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salsola tragus
Salsola tragus · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Russian thistle and Palmer amaranth control was best later in the season when a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later season Palmer amaranth control was best with a preemergence herbicide followed by postemergence treatment.

Treatment
a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatmente0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
later in the seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Russian thistle and Palmer amaranth control was best later in the season when a PRE herbicide was followed by a postemergence (POST) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments increased corn yield compared with untreated control.

Treatment
all herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all herbicide treatments increased yields compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields were greatest with Lumax EZ preemergence followed by Acuron and glyphosate postemergence.

Treatment
Lumax EZ PRE (atrazine/mesotrione/metolachlor) was followed by Acuron (atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/metolachlor) and glyphosate POSTe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were greatest when Lumax EZ PRE (atrazine/mesotrione/metolachlor) was followed by Acuron (atrazine/bicyclopyrone/mesotrione/metolachlor) and glyphosate POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mesotrione · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

herbicide · Salsola tragus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.