Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercultivation followed by hand weeding significantly decreased weed density versus other treatments.

A claim from Effect of herbicide mixtures on weeds and yield of summer groundnut · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercultivation followed by hand weeding significantly decreased weed density versus other treatments.

Taxon
summer groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
intercultivation (IC) followed by (fb) hand weeding (HW) at 20 and 50 days after seeding (DAS)e0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed density decreased significantly with pre-emergence application (PE) of pendimethalin + oxyfluorfen (tank mix) 900 + 120 g/ha and intercultivation (IC) followed by (fb) hand weeding (HW) at 20 and 50 days after seeding (DAS), as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–629
t0

“summer groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67

Title

Effect of herbicide mixtures on weeds and yield of summer groundnut

T.G. Lakshmidevi; V.J. Patel; B.D. Patel; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2022. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2022.00060.0

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e00234cd33c3e97043d5e9633ef75b5c07d05d6ddbefe254003046c9167c40da · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 119 positive, 12 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.