Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pruned peach trees had lower dry weight than controls at season end.

A claim from The influence of severe shoot pruning on growth, carbon and nitrogen status in young peach trees (Prunus persica) · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned peach trees had lower dry weight than controls at season end.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
prunede0
Outcome
dry weightse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
2.5 months after pruninge0
Comparator
control treese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry weights of pruned trees were lower than those of control trees at the end of the growing season (i.e., 2.5 months after pruning), whereas shoot:root ratios were restored to the initial values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–685
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96

Title

The influence of severe shoot pruning on growth, carbon and nitrogen status in young peach trees (Prunus persica)

S. Mediene; M. O. Jordan; L. Pages; et al. Tree Physiology 2002. doi:10.1093/treephys/22.18.1289

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e0051939a790478cc18176dc87c812b3f8883151e5fbe0ea82af87abb9cfd93f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

pruning · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

64 papers: 42 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.