Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Groundnut germination, seedling growth and dry weight were higher on soil amended with cow dung and vermicompost than on lead acetate polluted soil.

A claim from ISSN 2277-386X Original Article Enhancement of groundnut yield by soil amendments · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut germination, seedling growth and dry weight were higher on soil amended with cow dung and vermicompost than on lead acetate polluted soil.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
cow dung and vermicomposte0
Outcome
germination percentage, seedling growth and dry weighte1
Direction
highe1
Comparator
lead acetate polluted soile1
Setting
Pot culturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot culture experiment was conducted to find out the suitable amelioration for lead toxicity by growing groundnut on leaded soil amended with cow dung and vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–167
e1

“The germination percentage, seedling growth and dry weight of groundnut seedlings were high at amended soil when compared to lead acetate polluted soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–491

Title

ISSN 2277-386X Original Article Enhancement of groundnut yield by soil amendments

J. Rameshkumar; L. Baskaran; R. Rajaram; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-e028da589ec0118cfc6738d54eac7591da90799f27fa8a1e6b3bf3199edd2300 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Cow manure did not significantly affect the number of leaves of peanuts.

    Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, activity of nitrate reductase and chlorophyll contents of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Kelud volcanic ash and manure treatment did not significantly affect peanut height or stover dry weight.

    Ketersediaan dan Serapan Ca Pada Kacang Tanah di Tanah Alfisols yang Diberi Abu Vulkanik Kelud dan Pupuk Kandang · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Cow manure residue did not significantly affect peanut height at 15, 30, or 45 DAP or branches at 30 and 45 DAP.

    Effects of biochar residue and cow manure residue on entisol chemical properties, growth, and production of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in second planting season · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization had no effect on plant height, number of filled pods and plant stand of groundnut.

    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization for groundnut in saline soil · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Seedling root length tended to be lower with solution from the shared treatment.

    Biocompatibility of Sweetpotato and Peanut in a Hydroponic System · 1998

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Seed slurry inoculation reduced germination and stand establishment.

    Response Of Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea) To Inoculation · 1982

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Without boron in the fertilizer, peanut stems sometimes cracked and dark areas appeared at the internodes.

    Effect of Imbalance of Boron Nutrition on the Peanut1 · 1966 · compared with plants with boron in the fertilizer

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Fertilization time and nitrogen dose had no significant effect on peanut plant height, maximum leaf number or leaf area index.

    APPLICATION OF FERTILIZATION TIME AND NITROGEN DOSAGE ON PEANUT PLANT (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2017

    Opposite direction

195 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.