Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn at 4 kg ha-1 and B at 3 kg ha-1 gave a 52% onion yield benefit versus control.

A claim from Effects of zinc and boron application on onion and their residual effects on Mungbean · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn at 4 kg ha-1 and B at 3 kg ha-1 gave a 52% onion yield benefit versus control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Zn at 4 kg ha-1 and B at 3 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
yield benefits for onione0
Direction
benefitse0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
control (Zn0­B0)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of Zn at 4 kg ha-1 and B at 3 kg ha-1 compared to control (Zn0­B0) gave 52% yield benefits for onion and 99% yield benefits for mungbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1310

Title

Effects of zinc and boron application on onion and their residual effects on Mungbean

R Begum; M Jahiruddin; MA Kader; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2015. doi:10.3329/pa.v26i2.25961

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e02a3a791f76d8514206e1355e7ee576b5b8a9b766ac1eca1da1f52fac761992 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.