Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In maize roots, Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ affected proton transport as reported.

A claim from The nature of proton‐translocating ATPases in maize roots · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize roots, Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ affected proton transport as reported.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+e0
Outcome
proton transporte0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
hydrolysise0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–57
e0

“Millimolar concentrations of Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ in the presence of Mg2+ inhibited proton transport significantly more than hydrolysis whereas Ba2+ and Ca2+ had little effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–759

Title

The nature of proton‐translocating ATPases in maize roots

Shu‐I Tu; Matthew T. Loper; David Brauer; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 1992. doi:10.1080/01904169209364372

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e05dc692ab11dbe45027cf6cc1ccb535523ff0b4013ee552f523ef785b428e03 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

cadmium(2+) · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

copper(2+) · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.