Claim · model-written summary
Antimycin A and myxothiazol produced substantially different dark transcriptome responses.
- Taxon
- Arabidopsis
Arabidopsist0 - Outcome
- large difference in transcriptome responsese0
- Comparator
- antimycin A and myxothiazole0
- Setting
- darke0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a large difference in transcriptome responses to antimycin A and myxothiazol in the dark”
t0“in Arabidopsis plants treated with myxothiazol”
Title
Yanqiao Zhu; Reena Narsai; Cunman He; et al. Plant Communications 2022. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100501
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Myxothiazol enhanced ANAC017 promoter binding in light versus dark, unlike antimycin A.
- Observation ANAC017 and circadian clock regulator binding sites overlapped in ANAC013 and AOX1a promoters.
- Observation ANAC017 and its regulated transcription factors had diurnal expression.
- Observation ANAC017-regulated genes had altered expression in clock mutants with and without myxothiazol.
- Intervention effect LHY and CCA1 expression magnitude decreased in the ANAC017 overexpression line.
- Observation ANAC017 and PIF4 had a protein–protein interaction.
- Observation The dark transcriptome responses were ANAC017-independent in shoots and roots and resembled biotic challenge and salicylic acid responses.
- Observation The dark transcriptome responses involved ERF and ZAT transcription factors.
- Mechanism Authors infer antimycin A stimulates another MRS pathway linked to salicylic acid and chloroplast retrograde signaling.