Claim · model-written summary
February planting, 64 kg ha −1 N and conservation tillage yielded a 5.8% advantage over 30 cm till at Shamana under medium emissions at mid-century.
- Treatment
- February planting, use of 64 kg ha −1 N and conservation tillagee0
- Outcome
- yield advantagee0
- Direction
- advantagee0
- Value
- 5.8%e0
- Comparator
- 30 cm tille0
- Setting
- Shamanae0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“February planting, use of 64 kg ha −1 N and conservation tillage provided yield advantage of 5.8% over the 30 cm till under medium GHGs emission scenario during mid-century period at Shamana”
t0“maize”
Title
Daniel Markos; Walelign Worku; Girma Mamo Scientific Reports 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39795-y
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Observation On-farm trial yield lay between farmer average and water-limited potential yield.
- Observation Farmer-field maize yield was projected to decline by mid-century and further by century end in low-potential clusters.
- Intervention effect Mulching at 5 t ha −1 projected a 4–5% yield advantage in Hawassa at mid-century.
- Intervention effect Conservation tillage and June planting projected over 13.4% yield advantage in Bilate under high emissions at mid-century.
- Intervention effect Ten t ha −1 mulch, conservation tillage and February planting projected a 1.8% yield advantage in Dilla versus control.
- Recommendation The authors favored nitrogen and mulching combined with tillage or planting-date adjustment as least risky.
- Recommendation Adaptations without mulching or nitrogen were judged least promising and highly risky.