Claim · model-written summary
The two genotypes did not differ significantly in Mythimna unipuncta growth in artificial-diet bioassays.
- Interactor
- Mythimna unipuncta
Mythimna unipunctae0pest - Outcome
- Mythimna unipuncta growthe0
- Direction
- No significant differencese0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant differences were found between these two genotypes for Mythimna unipuncta growth in bioassays with artificial diets.”
t0“Maize”
Title
Protective Effects of Resistant Beans on Maize Damage by Mythimna unipuncta and Sitotroga cerealella
José Cruz Jimenez-Galindo Plant 2018. doi:10.11648/j.plant.20180602.13
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Yellow T showed antixenosis to larvae on young maize plants.
- Intervention effect Pinto Saltillo controlled consumption of maize leaves.
- Intervention effect Yellow T controlled consumption of maize leaves.
- Observation Sitotroga cerealella caused the fewest holes in maize grains under Yellow T.
- Observation Sitotroga cerealella caused the most holes in maize grains under PS-AZH-15.
- Observation Adult numbers were lowest for Yellow T and PS-AZH-15.
- Observation Adult numbers were highest for Black T.
- Observation Yellow T showed antixenosis against both maize pests.
- Observation Yellow T was superior to the control for both maize pests.
- Recommendation The authors propose using Yellow T for future maize protection studies.
- Mechanism The authors infer genetic regulation of the antixenotic effect.
- Observation The protective mechanism lacked insecticidal properties.
- Mechanism The authors hypothesize that substances may alter tissue hardness or palatability.