Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer genetic regulation of the antixenotic effect.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“suggesting that there is a clear genetic regulation of this antixenotic effect”
t0“Maize”
Title
Protective Effects of Resistant Beans on Maize Damage by Mythimna unipuncta and Sitotroga cerealella
José Cruz Jimenez-Galindo Plant 2018. doi:10.11648/j.plant.20180602.13
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Yellow T showed antixenosis to larvae on young maize plants.
- Intervention effect Pinto Saltillo controlled consumption of maize leaves.
- Intervention effect Yellow T controlled consumption of maize leaves.
- Observation The two genotypes did not differ significantly in Mythimna unipuncta growth in artificial-diet bioassays.
- Observation Sitotroga cerealella caused the fewest holes in maize grains under Yellow T.
- Observation Sitotroga cerealella caused the most holes in maize grains under PS-AZH-15.
- Observation Adult numbers were lowest for Yellow T and PS-AZH-15.
- Observation Adult numbers were highest for Black T.
- Observation Yellow T showed antixenosis against both maize pests.
- Observation Yellow T was superior to the control for both maize pests.
- Recommendation The authors propose using Yellow T for future maize protection studies.
- Observation The protective mechanism lacked insecticidal properties.
- Mechanism The authors hypothesize that substances may alter tissue hardness or palatability.