Claim · model-written summary
No significant physiological response to adverse factors was established.
- Taxon
- Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)
Pinus sylvestrise2 - Outcome
- physiological responsee7
- Qualifier
- by calculating sensitivity coefficientse7
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”
e7“Based on standardisation of individual chronologies by calculating sensitivity coefficients, no significant physiological response was established”
Title
GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESILIENCE OF PINE FORESTS IN UKRAINIAN POLISSIA
O. LESNIK; V. BLYSHCHYK; A. ODRUZHENKO; et al. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science 2022. doi:10.31548/forest.13(1).2022.18-24
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Radial increment variability decreases with tree age, ranging from 0.99 to 2.78 mm.
- Observation The average radial increment was 1.79 mm.
- Observation The average number of annual rings was 80, with a minimum of 61 and a maximum of 92.
- Observation The pairwise correlation of radial increment with tree age is inverse, at -0.54.
- Observation The pairwise correlation of current increment by diameter with tree age is inverse, at -0.53.
- Observation Diameter at breast height has a direct relationship with age, at 0.87.
- Observation Maximum resistance of pine stands to adverse environmental factors is reached at 50-60 years of age.
- Method / resource The width-dynamics growth model had an adequacy value of 0.46.
- Method / resource The diameter at breast height model had an adequacy value of 0.78.
- Method / resource The current increment by diameter model had an adequacy value of 0.51.