Paper · 2022 · Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science

GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESILIENCE OF PINE FORESTS IN UKRAINIAN POLISSIA

O. LESNIK; V. BLYSHCHYK; A. ODRUZHENKO; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The main prerequisite for this study is the use of forest resources corresponding to the principles of sustainable forest management. The purpose of this study is to figure out the growth characteristics of pine stands and their physiological response to adverse factors. The experimental material (cores) was selected from pine forests of Ukrainian Polissia using Haglöf increment borer at breast height of 1.3 m. The number of annual rings and the parameters of radial increment were found using the ImageJ software. The result was a tree-ring chronology of sample trees. Statistical analysis of the experimental data proved that the radial increment variability decreases with age, and it ranges within 0.99-2.78 mm. The average radial increment value in the data set under study is 1.79 mm. The average number of annual rings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees is 80: the minimum is 61, the maximum is 92. The correlation analysis of experimental data proved that the pairwise correlation coefficients of radial increment (-0.54) and current increment by diameter (-0.53) have an inverse relationship with the age of trees, and diameter at breast height with age – a direct relationship (0.87). The developed mathematical models of the dynamics of the width of the annual ring, the diameter at breast height and the current increment by diameter allow estimating the growth characteristics of Scots pine trees throughout their life. The obtained results were compared with the growth tables of fully stocked (at a relative stocking of 1.0) stands. The adequacy test of the developed mathematical models proved the accuracy of the given patterns and is as follows: for the width dynamics of the annual ring – 0.46; the diameter at breast height – 0.78, and the percentage of current increment by diameter – 0.51. Based on standardisation of individual chronologies by calculating sensitivity coefficients, no significant physiological response was established. Accordingly, the impact of short-term stress reactions is insignificant. The maximum resistance of pine stands to adverse environmental factors is achieved at the age of 50-60 years. This study is important to evaluate the impact of climate change and other adverse factors on the growth of pine stands and forecasting the dynamics of biometric indices. The obtained results can be used by the specialists at IA “Ukrderzhlisproekt” to update biometric indices and substantiate the use of forest resources

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radial increment variability decreases with tree age, ranging from 0.99 to 2.78 mm.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
radial increment variabilitye1
Direction
decreasese1
Value
0.99-2.78 mme1
Qualifier
with agee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“radial increment variability decreases with age, and it ranges within 0.99-2.78 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average radial increment was 1.79 mm.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
average radial increment valuee3
Value
1.79 mme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e3

“The average radial increment value in the data set under study is 1.79 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average number of annual rings was 80, with a minimum of 61 and a maximum of 92.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise4
Outcome
number of annual ringse4
Value
80e4
Qualifier
the minimum is 61, the maximum is 92e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The average number of annual rings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees is 80: the minimum is 61, the maximum is 92”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pairwise correlation of radial increment with tree age is inverse, at -0.54.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
pairwise correlation coefficients of radial incremente5
Direction
inverse relationshipe5
Value
-0.54e5
Qualifier
with the age of treese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e5

“the pairwise correlation coefficients of radial increment (-0.54) and current increment by diameter (-0.53) have an inverse relationship with the age of trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pairwise correlation of current increment by diameter with tree age is inverse, at -0.53.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
current increment by diametere5
Direction
inverse relationshipe5
Value
-0.53e5
Qualifier
with the age of treese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e5

“the pairwise correlation coefficients of radial increment (-0.54) and current increment by diameter (-0.53) have an inverse relationship with the age of trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter at breast height has a direct relationship with age, at 0.87.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
diameter at breast heighte6
Direction
direct relationshipe6
Value
0.87e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e6

“diameter at breast height with age – a direct relationship (0.87)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant physiological response to adverse factors was established.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
physiological responsee7
Qualifier
by calculating sensitivity coefficientse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e7

“Based on standardisation of individual chronologies by calculating sensitivity coefficients, no significant physiological response was established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1969 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum resistance of pine stands to adverse environmental factors is reached at 50-60 years of age.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
resistance of pine stands to adverse environmental factorse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
50-60 yearse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum resistance of pine stands to adverse environmental factors is achieved at the age of 50-60 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2152 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The width-dynamics growth model had an adequacy value of 0.46.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
width dynamics of the annual ringe1
Value
0.46e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“for the width dynamics of the annual ring – 0.46”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1723 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The diameter at breast height model had an adequacy value of 0.78.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
diameter at breast heighte1
Value
0.78e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“the diameter at breast height – 0.78”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1761 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The current increment by diameter model had an adequacy value of 0.51.

Taxon
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)Pinus sylvestrise2
Outcome
the percentage of current increment by diametere1
Value
0.51e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percentage of current increment by diameter – 0.51”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1821 · show in text ↑