Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spiders and coccinellid beetles averaged more individuals under IPM than non-IPM management.

A claim from Impact of IPM and non-IPM practices on sucking pest complex and natural enemies of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus l.) pests · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spiders and coccinellid beetles averaged more individuals under IPM than non-IPM management.

Treatment
IPMe0
Interactor
spiders and coccinellid beetlese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mean population of natural enemiese0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
3.58 + 2.39 number per plante0
Comparator
non-IPM plote0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean population of natural enemies viz., spiders and coccinellid beetles were found 3.58 + 2.39 number per plant in IPM as compared to that of 2.70 + 2.39 number per plant in non-IPM plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1410
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87

Title

Impact of IPM and non-IPM practices on sucking pest complex and natural enemies of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus l.) pests

Viswanadha Raghuteja Puvvala; N Emmanuel; A. Sujatha; et al. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2020

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e10a3f09499604e169d9b30f3fae402e2cb840990c62a8448ed590423acb8e1e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

ipm · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.