Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Forage legume intercropping caused greater erosion than sole cassava in the first cropping period.

A claim from Soil Conservation Effectiveness and Crop Productivity of Forage Legume Intercropping, Contour Grass Barriers and Contour Ridging in Cassava on Andean Hillsides · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage legume intercropping caused greater erosion than sole cassava in the first cropping period.

Treatment
forage legume intercroppinge0
Outcome
Erosione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
first cropping periode0
Comparator
cassava sole croppinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Erosion was greater with forage legume intercropping than with cassava sole cropping in the first cropping period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–511

Title

Soil Conservation Effectiveness and Crop Productivity of Forage Legume Intercropping, Contour Grass Barriers and Contour Ridging in Cassava on Andean Hillsides

D. E. Leihner; M. Ruppenthal; T. H. Hilger; et al. Experimental Agriculture 1996. doi:10.1017/s0014479700026260

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e120329577abd04fcd6875e17430c78dff47f6b6ce746e360abe9df5831dfbea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

intercropping · soil: physics · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.