Paper · 2007 · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)

Agronomic practices for sustainable cassava production in Asia

Reinhardt H. Howeler

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The paper describes research results obtained in the development of improved cultural practices, such as time and method of planting, weed control, fertilization, intercropping and erosion control.Experiments have shown that cassava yields are seriously reduced if either low rainfall or low temperatures are limiting growth during the period of 3-5 months after planting; that planting vertically or inclined produces higher yields than planting horizontally, especially during periods of drought; that planting on ridges is better in the rainy season but planting on the flat is better in the dry season; that high and sustainable yields can be maintained either with the application of 5-10 t/ha of animal manure supplemented with 50-100 kg/ha of N and/or K 2 O as chemical fertilizers (depending on soil fertility characteristics), or by the application of chemical fertilizers alone with a ratio of N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O of 2:1:2 or 2:1:3, but not by organic or green manures alone; that intercropping with peanut generally increases total income and protects the soil from erosion; and that fertilization, intercropping, contour ridging and contour hedgerows of grasses are simple but effective ways to reduce erosion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rainfall during months 3–5 after planting seriously reduces cassava yield.

Treatment
low rainfalle0
Outcome
cassava yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
period of 3-5 months after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava yields are seriously reduced if either low rainfall or low temperatures are limiting growth during the period of 3-5 months after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–371 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature during months 3–5 after planting seriously reduces cassava yield.

Treatment
low temperaturese0
Outcome
cassava yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
period of 3-5 months after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cassava yields are seriously reduced if either low rainfall or low temperatures are limiting growth during the period of 3-5 months after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vertical planting produces higher cassava yields than horizontal planting, especially in drought.

Treatment
planting verticallye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
periods of droughte0
Comparator
planting horizontallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting vertically or inclined produces higher yields than planting horizontally, especially during periods of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inclined planting produces higher cassava yields than horizontal planting, especially in drought.

Treatment
inclinede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
periods of droughte0
Comparator
planting horizontallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting vertically or inclined produces higher yields than planting horizontally, especially during periods of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge planting is better in the rainy season.

Treatment
planting on ridgese0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
rainy seasone0
Comparator
planting on the flate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting on ridges is better in the rainy season but planting on the flat is better in the dry season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat planting is better in the dry season.

Treatment
planting on the flate0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
dry seasone0
Comparator
planting on ridgese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting on ridges is better in the rainy season but planting on the flat is better in the dry season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal manure supplemented with chemical N or K fertilizer maintains high, sustainable cassava yields.

Treatment
5-10 t/ha of animal manure supplemented with 50-100 kg/ha of N and/or K 2 O as chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
high and sustainable yieldse0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
depending on soil fertility characteristicse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high and sustainable yields can be maintained either with the application of 5-10 t/ha of animal manure supplemented with 50-100 kg/ha of N and/or K 2 O as chemical fertilizers (depending on soil fertility characteristics)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizers alone at N:P:K ratios of 2:1:2 or 2:1:3 maintain high, sustainable cassava yields.

Treatment
chemical fertilizers alone with a ratio of N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O of 2:1:2 or 2:1:3e0
Outcome
high and sustainable yieldse0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
organic or green manures alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high and sustainable yields can be maintained either with the application of 5-10 t/ha of animal manure supplemented with 50-100 kg/ha of N and/or K 2 O as chemical fertilizers (depending on soil fertility characteristics), or by the application of chemical fertilizers alone with a ratio of N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O of 2:1:2 or 2:1:3, but not by organic or green manures alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic or green manure alone does not maintain high, sustainable cassava yields.

Treatment
organic or green manures alonee0
Outcome
high and sustainable yieldse0
Direction
note0
Comparator
chemical fertilizers alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high and sustainable yields can be maintained either with the application of 5-10 t/ha of animal manure supplemented with 50-100 kg/ha of N and/or K 2 O as chemical fertilizers (depending on soil fertility characteristics), or by the application of chemical fertilizers alone with a ratio of N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O of 2:1:2 or 2:1:3, but not by organic or green manures alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropping generally increases total income.

Treatment
intercropping with peanute0
Interactor
peanutArachis hypogaeae0other
Outcome
total incomee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with peanut generally increases total income and protects the soil from erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropping protects soil from erosion.

Treatment
intercropping with peanute0
Interactor
peanutArachis hypogaeae0other
Outcome
soil from erosione0
Direction
protectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with peanut generally increases total income and protects the soil from erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization reduces erosion.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
erosione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization, intercropping, contour ridging and contour hedgerows of grasses are simple but effective ways to reduce erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduces erosion.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
erosione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization, intercropping, contour ridging and contour hedgerows of grasses are simple but effective ways to reduce erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contour ridging reduces erosion.

Treatment
contour ridginge0
Outcome
erosione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization, intercropping, contour ridging and contour hedgerows of grasses are simple but effective ways to reduce erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass contour hedgerows reduce erosion.

Treatment
contour hedgerows of grassese0
Outcome
erosione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization, intercropping, contour ridging and contour hedgerows of grasses are simple but effective ways to reduce erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · soil: physics · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

intercropping · soil: physics · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.