Claim · model-written summary
Interplanting peanut did not significantly affect cassava yield.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- interplanting of either soybean, mungbean, cowpea, peanute0
- Interactor
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0other - Outcome
- cassava yieldse0
- Setting
- Bohole0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In an intercropping trial in Bohol, even after three cropping cycles, cassava yields were not significantly affected by interplanting of either soybean, mungbean, cowpea, peanut or pole sitao (yard-long bean).”
Title
Recent progress in cassava agronomy research in the Philippines
Fernando A. Evangelio; F. G. Villamayor; A.G. Dingal; et al. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) 1995
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect The fifth fertility-trial cropping cycle showed no significant fertilizer response.
- Intervention effect The sixth consecutive cropping year showed some fertilizer response.
- Intervention effect Soil loss was highest with inorganic fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Soil loss was lowest with vetiver grass barriers.
- Intervention effect Soil loss was lowest with grass mulch.
- Intervention effect Root yield was highest with grass mulch.
- Intervention effect Root yield was highest with intercropped Crotalaria juncea mulched at two months.
- Intervention effect Root yield was lowest with lemon grass barriers.
- Intervention effect The heavier-canopy variety responded more markedly to fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Interplanting soybean did not significantly affect cassava yield.
- Intervention effect Interplanting mungbean did not significantly affect cassava yield.
- Intervention effect Interplanting cowpea did not significantly affect cassava yield.
- Intervention effect Interplanting pole sitao did not significantly affect cassava yield.
- Intervention effect Row spacing significantly affected cassava yield.
- Intervention effect Row spacing significantly affected intercrop yield.
- Intervention effect Raising plant density to 15,000–25,000 plants/ha markedly increased cassava yield.
- Intervention effect Changing pruning age produced no significant differences.