Paper · 2011 · Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture

Yield and Benefit Analysis of Cassava Intercropping Mode in Wuming County

Lu KunDian

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

6 demonstration bases for the models of cassava intercropped or interplant were built in Wuming County,Guangxi Province,P.R.China in 2009.the analytical results of yield and benefit showed that: compare with single cassava model(CK),water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybean improved 6.1%-25.2% cassava fresh root yield than CK;1.6-4.2 times total income of CK;1.7-4.9 times net income of CK.Interplant model of melon were high benefit than the intercropped model of peanut or soybean.Above model were 16 800 hm2 planted area and occupied 60% in whole Wuming county in 2009.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed melon and legume intercropping modes raised cassava root yield by 6.1%-25.2% relative to monoculture.

Treatment
water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybeane0
Outcome
cassava fresh root yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6.1%-25.2%e0
Comparator
single cassava model(CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compare with single cassava model(CK),water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybean improved 6.1%-25.2% cassava fresh root yield than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping modes generated 1.6-4.2 times the monoculture total income.

Treatment
water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybeane0
Outcome
total incomee0
Value
1.6-4.2 timese0
Comparator
single cassava model(CK)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybean improved 6.1%-25.2% cassava fresh root yield than CK;1.6-4.2 times total income of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–424 · show in text ↑
e1

“single cassava model(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping modes generated 1.7-4.9 times the monoculture net income.

Treatment
water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybeane0
Outcome
net incomee0
Value
1.7-4.9 timese0
Comparator
single cassava model(CK)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybean improved 6.1%-25.2% cassava fresh root yield than CK;1.6-4.2 times total income of CK;1.7-4.9 times net income of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–455 · show in text ↑
e1

“single cassava model(CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon interplanting had higher benefit than peanut or soybean intercropping.

Treatment
Interplant model of melone0
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
intercropped model of peanut or soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interplant model of melon were high benefit than the intercropped model of peanut or soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava intercropped peanut or soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The models covered 16 800 hm2 and 60% of Wuming county in 2009.

Outcome
planted areae0
Value
16 800 hm2e0
Qualifier
60%e0
Setting
Wuming countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above model were 16 800 hm2 planted area and occupied 60% in whole Wuming county in 2009.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–638 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava intercropped peanut or soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–338 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Citrullus lanatus · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.