Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The listed melon and legume intercropping modes raised cassava root yield by 6.1%-25.2% relative to monoculture.

A claim from Yield and Benefit Analysis of Cassava Intercropping Mode in Wuming County · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed melon and legume intercropping modes raised cassava root yield by 6.1%-25.2% relative to monoculture.

Treatment
water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybeane0
Outcome
cassava fresh root yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6.1%-25.2%e0
Comparator
single cassava model(CK)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compare with single cassava model(CK),water melon,pumpkin,muskmelon or hair melon interplant cassava,and cassava intercropped peanut or soybean improved 6.1%-25.2% cassava fresh root yield than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–391

Title

Yield and Benefit Analysis of Cassava Intercropping Mode in Wuming County

Lu KunDian Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture 2011

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ec60fe69bb6907f9b5a7e6a24f83ab5c8ebb1c5727d11dde9a3be0f5a311b7f7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Glycine max · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Citrullus lanatus · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.