Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Peanut intercropping generally increases total income.

A claim from Agronomic practices for sustainable cassava production in Asia · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut intercropping generally increases total income.

Treatment
intercropping with peanute0
Interactor
peanutArachis hypogaeae0other
Outcome
total incomee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with peanut generally increases total income and protects the soil from erosion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1081
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43

Title

Agronomic practices for sustainable cassava production in Asia

Reinhardt H. Howeler CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) 2007

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e5124143043370464bbcb3206321a60307482b05e192518c6fef15a830bb209a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

78 papers: 48 positive, 30 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.