Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At flowering, 25 g/m2 ammonium sulfate raised wheat seed PEPCase activity 1.17-fold.

A claim from Concomitant Increases of the Developing Seed Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Ac-tivity and the Seed Protein Content of Field-Grown Wheat with Nitrogen Supply · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, 25 g/m2 ammonium sulfate raised wheat seed PEPCase activity 1.17-fold.

Treatment
ammonium sulfate application at 8.3 and 25 g/m2e0
Gene
PEPCasee0
Outcome
PEPCase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.17-folde0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With ammonium sulfate application at 8.3 and 25 g/m2 at a flowering stage, seeds showed higher PEPCase activity (1.08- and 1.17-fold, respectively) and protein content (1.15- and 1.42-fold, respectively), depending on the nitrogen level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1133
e1

“field-grown wheat seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–709

Title

Concomitant Increases of the Developing Seed Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Ac-tivity and the Seed Protein Content of Field-Grown Wheat with Nitrogen Supply

Naoki Yamamoto; Toshio Sugimoto; Takehiro Masumura Agricultural Sciences 2014. doi:10.4236/as.2014.514167

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e120a5b423e95ac543514e69084652c71152f1ffba60f57203249180025acea4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

ammonium sulfate · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.