Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At flowering, 25 g/m2 ammonium sulfate raised wheat seed protein content 1.42-fold.

A claim from Concomitant Increases of the Developing Seed Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Ac-tivity and the Seed Protein Content of Field-Grown Wheat with Nitrogen Supply · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, 25 g/m2 ammonium sulfate raised wheat seed protein content 1.42-fold.

Treatment
ammonium sulfate application at 8.3 and 25 g/m2e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.42-folde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With ammonium sulfate application at 8.3 and 25 g/m2 at a flowering stage, seeds showed higher PEPCase activity (1.08- and 1.17-fold, respectively) and protein content (1.15- and 1.42-fold, respectively), depending on the nitrogen level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1133
e1

“field-grown wheat seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–709

Title

Concomitant Increases of the Developing Seed Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Ac-tivity and the Seed Protein Content of Field-Grown Wheat with Nitrogen Supply

Naoki Yamamoto; Toshio Sugimoto; Takehiro Masumura Agricultural Sciences 2014. doi:10.4236/as.2014.514167

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-4c7f59998a87b2ea78218511ce8777ca9996de53642b58bcf95532de15ea5167 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

ammonium sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.