Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium biofertilizer P4 produced 174.3 root nodules on peanut, above the control with 0 nodules.

A claim from POTENTIAL OF Rhizobium sp. I 3 AND Agrobacterium sp. I 3 7 IN FORMATION OF ROOT NODULES AND STIMULATING GROWTH OF Arachis hypogaea L. · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium biofertilizer P4 produced 174.3 root nodules on peanut, above the control with 0 nodules.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
P4 ( Rhizobium biofertilizer)e2
Interactor
Rhizobium sp.I 3e0symbiont
Outcome
root nodulese2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
174.3e2
Comparator
control treatment (P0)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STIMULATING GROWTH OF Arachis hypogaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–133
e1

“the control treatment (P0) had 0 nodules, 8.26 g biomass, and 3.54% tissue nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–884
e2

“P4 ( Rhizobium biofertilizer) with 174.3 root nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–984
e0

“Rhizobium sp.I 3 and Agrobacterium sp.I 37 bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–51

Title

POTENTIAL OF Rhizobium sp. I 3 AND Agrobacterium sp. I 3 7 IN FORMATION OF ROOT NODULES AND STIMULATING GROWTH OF Arachis hypogaea L.

Retno Rosariastuti; Fuada K. Yudha Engenharia Agrícola 2022. doi:10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v42n5e20200209/2022

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e1272a5e44d7a4e67a9bb24e2aad0b5ed111e0742c29211c6b5236e058eb2a24 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 66 positive, 6 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.