Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for the number and dry weight of nodules per plant.

A claim from Effect Of Cobalt, Rhizobium And Phosphobacterium Inoculations On Growth, Yield, Quality And Nutrient Uptake Of Summer Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea) · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for the number and dry weight of nodules per plant.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae5
Treatment
Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphobacteriume0other
Outcome
no. and dry weight (gm) of nodules per plante0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
at different dates of observatione0
Comparator
phosphobacteriume0
Setting
Barajaguli, B. C. K. V., Nadia, West Bengale5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“A field experiment was carried out on the neutral soil of Student’s Instructional Farm, Barajaguli, B. C. K. V., Nadia, West Bengal with groundnut during pre-kharif season (Feb-June) of 2001, 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205
e0

“in increasing plant height (cm), no. of branches per plant, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation (gm per m2) and no. and dry weight (gm) of nodules per plant at different dates of observation, Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–477

Title

Effect Of Cobalt, Rhizobium And Phosphobacterium Inoculations On Growth, Yield, Quality And Nutrient Uptake Of Summer Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea)

Basu, T K Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2010. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8090

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-f8003ff1370f222194d93f26c85bab898e27829d9e6b4748bca576fe180ee58f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.