Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for higher oil and protein content in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae5 - Treatment
- Rhizobiume1
- Second interactor
- phosphobacteriume1other
- Outcome
- oil and protein contente1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- phosphobacteriume1
- Setting
- Barajaguli, B. C. K. V., Nadia, West Bengale5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“A field experiment was carried out on the neutral soil of Student’s Instructional Farm, Barajaguli, B. C. K. V., Nadia, West Bengal with groundnut during pre-kharif season (Feb-June) of 2001, 2002 and 2003”
e1“Again it was found that Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for higher pod yield, shelling percent, oil and protein content”
Title
Basu, T K Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2010. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8090
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for increasing plant height, branch number and leaf area index of groundnut.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for increasing dry matter accumulation in groundnut.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for the number and dry weight of nodules per plant.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for higher pod yield and shelling percent in groundnut.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium had better performance than phosphobacterium in N and K concentration of groundnut.
- Intervention effect Phosphobacterium gave better result than Rhizobium in P concentration of groundnut.
- Intervention effect Rhizobium inoculation gave higher uptake of all three nutrients than phosphobacterium in groundnut.
- Intervention effect Cobalt at 0.21 kg per ha gave the best result in all the above-mentioned parameters of groundnut.