Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for higher oil and protein content in groundnut.

A claim from Effect Of Cobalt, Rhizobium And Phosphobacterium Inoculations On Growth, Yield, Quality And Nutrient Uptake Of Summer Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea) · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for higher oil and protein content in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae5
Treatment
Rhizobiume1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
phosphobacteriume1other
Outcome
oil and protein contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
phosphobacteriume1
Setting
Barajaguli, B. C. K. V., Nadia, West Bengale5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“A field experiment was carried out on the neutral soil of Student’s Instructional Farm, Barajaguli, B. C. K. V., Nadia, West Bengal with groundnut during pre-kharif season (Feb-June) of 2001, 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205
e1

“Again it was found that Rhizobium was more effective than phosphobacterium for higher pod yield, shelling percent, oil and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–617

Title

Effect Of Cobalt, Rhizobium And Phosphobacterium Inoculations On Growth, Yield, Quality And Nutrient Uptake Of Summer Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea)

Basu, T K Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2010. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8090

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-f53d4f34924b6b6365488893029752beea88cf1535bd19a255db62e5bae1b8e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.