Paper · 2010 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium on the Growth of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.).

K. Ramakrishnan; M. Lenin

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can increase the capability of the root systems to absorb and translocate phosphorus (P) and minor elements through an extensive network of mycelium. AM fungi are commonly associated with legumes and can increase nutrient uptake of plants growing in high phosphate fixing soils. The present study the efforts of AM fungi Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium on groundnut Arachis hypogaea L. The AM fungi Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation plants resulted in production of highest biomass such as plant, shoot length, root length, number of leaves, total number of root nodules, fresh and dry weight of plants and the biochemical content such as chlorophyll ‘a’ and ‘b’, total sugar, starch content, proline, carbohydrates and protein contents. The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments. Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar – 608 002 Please Cite This Article As: K. Ramakrishnan and M. Lenin. 2010. Effect of Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium on the Growth of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Ecobiotechnol. 2(5):01-08. Â

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium gave enhanced biomass compared with other treatments.

Taxon
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobiume0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation gave the highest shoot length, root length and number of leaves of groundnut.

Taxon
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
shoot length, root length, number of leavese1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“The AM fungi Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation plants resulted in production of highest biomass such as plant, shoot length, root length, number of leaves, total number of root nodules, fresh and dry weight of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation gave the highest total number of root nodules and fresh and dry weight of groundnut.

Taxon
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
total number of root nodules, fresh and dry weight of plantse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“The AM fungi Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation plants resulted in production of highest biomass such as plant, shoot length, root length, number of leaves, total number of root nodules, fresh and dry weight of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation gave higher chlorophyll a and b content in groundnut.

Taxon
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll ‘a’ and ‘b’e3
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“The AM fungi Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation plants resulted in production of highest biomass such as plant, shoot length, root length, number of leaves, total number of root nodules, fresh and dry weight of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–659 · show in text ↑
e3

“the biochemical content such as chlorophyll ‘a’ and ‘b’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation gave higher total sugar, starch content and proline in groundnut.

Taxon
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobiume0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
total sugar, starch content, prolinee2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“total sugar, starch content, proline, carbohydrates and protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium inoculation gave higher carbohydrate and protein contents in groundnut.

Taxon
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobiume0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
carbohydrates and protein contentse2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“The inoculation of Glomus intraradices + Rhizobium showed an enhanced biomass when compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“total sugar, starch content, proline, carbohydrates and protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–793 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Rhizophagus intraradices · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizobium · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizobium · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 66 positive, 6 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

inoculation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 102 positive, 17 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.