Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ectomycorrhizal inoculation increased foliage density of loblolly pine.

A claim from Ozone, Acid Deposition, and Mycorrhization Effects on Loblolly Pine and White Oak · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectomycorrhizal inoculation increased foliage density of loblolly pine.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Interactor
Pisolithus tinctoriusPisolithus tinctoriuse1symbiont
Outcome
foliage densitye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
natural mycobionte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pisolithus tinctorius
Pisolithus tinctorius · InteractorPaul venter · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“juvenile loblolly pine (Pinus taedaL.) and white oak (Quercus albaL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–115
e1

“induced ectomycorrhizal colonization (Pisolithus tinctorius [Pers.] Coker & Couch vs. natural mycobiont)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–322
e2

“inoculation produced a substantial increase in above- and below-ground growth of both pine and oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1614
e3

“also increased foliage density but reduced specific root length in each species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1699

Title

Ozone, Acid Deposition, and Mycorrhization Effects on Loblolly Pine and White Oak

R. F. Walker; S. B. McLaughlin Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2001. doi:10.1300/j091v14n02_03

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e130f3762fc06d3be204c996c75b9bdb389d75839df15cae7f6626210fed23c2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 16 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Pisolithus tinctorius · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.