Claim · model-written summary
Canola water-use net benefit was 3–4 times that of rice.
- Taxon
- canola
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napus var. napuse0 - Outcome
- Net benefit of water usee0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 3–4 timese0
- Comparator
- ricee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Net benefit of water use in canola cultivation is 3–4 times greater than in rice”
Title
Bahareh Shamgani-Mashhadi; Mehdi Nadi; Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109106
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Method / resource DSSAT rice yield differed from observations by 236 kg ha⁻¹.
- Method / resource DSSAT canola yield differed from observations by 121 kg ha⁻¹.
- Intervention effect A 40% irrigation reduction raised rice yield to 5654 kg ha⁻¹ under I3N2.
- Intervention effect Reduced rice water consumption lowered production costs by 27%.
- Intervention effect Reduced rice water use increased WP by 46.7%.
- Intervention effect Reduced rice water use increased net benefits by 43.1%.
- Intervention effect Reduced rice water use increased gross benefits by 47.9%.
- Association Increasing canola nitrogen application by 30% correlated with a 9% yield increase.
- Intervention effect N3 increased canola WP by 6.7% over current nitrogen application.
- Intervention effect N3 increased canola NUE by 1.4% over current nitrogen application.
- Intervention effect N3 increased canola net benefits by 9.1%.
- Intervention effect N3 increased canola gross benefits by 9.2%.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen fertilizer reduced rice yield and economic efficiency.
- Association Nitrogen uptake and grain yield were positively correlated in rice and canola.
- Recommendation The authors recommend stable or reduced nitrogen application levels.