Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation schedules did not significantly affect harvest index.

A claim from Influence of Different Tillage Practices, Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels on Yield and Economics of Rice Fallow Maize · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation schedules did not significantly affect harvest index.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation schedulese0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index was significantly effected by tillage practices but it is non-significant with irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1275
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116

Title

Influence of Different Tillage Practices, Irrigation and Nitrogen Levels on Yield and Economics of Rice Fallow Maize

Ganta Harshitha; G. Sreenivas; N. Mahesh; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2024. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i74271

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e188aba1922db1bedcb597cc67a20371f53e639c1ee687ca9ef11dfb9229b7be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this claim · 791 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Irrigation increased mean maize yields by 36% compared with rain-fed maize in the western Great Plains.

    Evaluation of a Process-Based Agro-Ecosystem Model (Agro-IBIS) across the U.S. Corn Belt: Simulations of the Interannual Variability in Maize Yield · 2003 · compared with rain-fed maize

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Corn grain yield increased with irrigation from no postplant irrigation to full crop water use in 1992.

    Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Corn in Response to LEPA Irrigation · 1995 · compared with no-post plant irrigations

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    SDD irrigation increased economic profits by +11.2% versus MAD.

    Sustainable irrigation based on co-regulation of soil water supply and atmospheric evaporative demand · 2021 · compared with MAD

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Irrigation boosted corn yields by 75%–90% over rain-fed corn in Nebraska, Kansas and Texas.

    Trends and Variability in U.S. Corn Yields Over the Twentieth Century · 2005 · compared with rain-fed corn

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Maize yields under irrigation were 81% higher than under rainfed conditions.

    Quantifying irrigation cooling benefits to maize yield in the US Midwest · 2020 · compared with rainfed maize

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Furrow planting with film-mulched ridges increased maize grain yield by 29% and 28% on average compared with the check.

    Plastic-Film Mulching for Enhanced Water-Use Efficiency and Economic Returns from Maize Fields in Semiarid China · 2017 · compared with check

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Each additional 60 mm irrigation increased simulated crop yield by 1.2 t ha −1.

    Modeling Wheat and Maize Productivity as Affected by Climate Variation and Irrigation Supply in North China Plain · 2010

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Full irrigation in sandy loam gave the highest maize yield.

    Effects of Soils and Irrigation Volume on Maize Yield, Irrigation Water Productivity, and Nitrogen Uptake · 2019

    Opposite direction

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.