Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Gypsum plus leguminous residues gave greater nutrient uptake.

A claim from Enhancement of the rootability of a structurally fragile tropical soil using gypsum and leguminous residues to increase the yield of maize · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum plus leguminous residues gave greater nutrient uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
gypsum plus leguminous residuese1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
no residue or gypsum (control, C)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“to increase the yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–138
e0

“no residue or gypsum (control, C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–525
e1

“Application of gypsum plus leguminous residues enhanced soil rootability, when applied to a tropical Arenic Hapludult, through the combined effects of increased porosity and decreased penetration resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–963
e2

“These improvements facilitated root growth in deeper soil layers and greater nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1057

Title

Enhancement of the rootability of a structurally fragile tropical soil using gypsum and leguminous residues to increase the yield of maize

E. G. Moura; V. G. L. Sena; C. C. M. Sousa; et al. Soil Use and Management 2016. doi:10.1111/sum.12251

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e23ca87648efcbe48f0b7382dad6cf325b75c9937939407f9e06a6ae5fea5399 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.