Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium + PSB + phosphorus 50 kg/ha gave maximum number of pods/plant (29.51) in greengram than other treatments.

A claim from Influence of biofertilizers and phosphorus on growth and yield of greengram · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium + PSB + phosphorus 50 kg/ha gave maximum number of pods/plant (29.51) in greengram than other treatments.

Taxon
Greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.)Vigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
Rhizobium + PSB + Phosphorus 50 kg/hae1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe1symbiont
Outcome
number of pods/plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
29.51e1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of Greengram (Phaseolus radiatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–316
e1

“treatment 9 (Rhizobium + PSB + Phosphorus 50 kg/ha) recorded significant and higher plant height (47.13 cm), maximum number of nodules/plant (8.55), higher plant dry weight (7.75 g), maximum number of pods/plant (29.51), maximum number of seeds/pod (7.47), higher test weight (40.59 g), higher seed yield (1204.92 kg/ha), and higher stover yield (2209.93 kg/ha), maximum gross return (97,498.83 INR/ha), maximum net return (64,684.83 INR/ha), maximum B:C ratio (1.97) was recorded in treatment 9 (Rhizobium + PSB + Phosphorus 50 kg/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–911

Title

Influence of biofertilizers and phosphorus on growth and yield of greengram

Aliya Khan; Victor Debbarma; Abhijeet Shyamsingh Chouhan; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i5a.665

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e24a5f563f897b1b84247be6c75bb25928baefa063682bf86a0e344a47a064c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.